The only way is down when it comes to Mile End lease terms. Mile End flats that have a remaining term fewer than eighty years will reduce in value at a rapid rate, and the cost to extend your lease will go up.
It is conventional wisdom that a residential leasehold with more than 100 years remaining is worth roughly the same as a freehold. Where an additional 90 years added to all but the shortest lease, the premises will be equivalent in value to a freehold for decades to come.
| Lender | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Barclays plc | |
| Chelsea Building Society | |
| Godiva Mortgages | |
| Skipton Building Society | |
| Virgin |
Regardless of whether you are a tenant or a landlord in Mile End,the lease extension experts that we work with will always be willing to discuss any residential leasehold matters and offer you the benefit of their experience and the close ties they enjoy with Mile End valuers.
Last year Ollie, started to get near to the 80-year mark with the lease on his purpose- built apartment in Mile End. Having bought his flat two decades ago, the unexpired term was of little concern. As luck would have it, he became aware that he needed to take action soon on Extending the lease. Ollie arranged for a lease extension at the eleventh hour in May. Ollie and the landlord who owned the flat above ultimately agreed on sum of £5,000 . If the lease had gone to less than eighty years, the amount would have escalated by at least £875.
Ms Robyn Díaz owned a one bedroom flat in Mile End in April 2008. The dilemma was if we could estimate the price would likely be for a ninety year lease extension. Comparable residencies in Mile End with a long lease were in the region of £240,600. The average amount of ground rent was £65 billed monthly. The lease ended on 3 April 2088. Taking into account 62 years outstanding we estimated the premium to the landlord for the lease extension to be between £21,900 and £25,200 plus legals.
An example of a Freehold Enfranchisement decision for a Mile End residence is 26 Rhondda Grove in June 2009. The net price payable by the leaseholders as determined by the Tribunal was £3,015.13. This comprised £11,300 premium for the reversion less £8,284.87 costs as ordered by the County Court.