On the balance of probabilities where you own a flat in Mile End you actually own a long leasehold interest over your property
It is conventional wisdom that a residential leasehold with more than one hundred years unexpired lease term is worth approximately the same as a freehold. Where an additional ninety years added to all but the shortest lease, the residence will be equivalent in value to a freehold for many years ahead.
| Lender | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Birmingham Midshires | |
| Chelsea Building Society | |
| Nationwide Building Society | |
| Royal Bank of Scotland | |
| Yorkshire Building Society |
Using our service will provide you increased control over the value of your Mile End leasehold, as your property will be more valuable and marketable in relation to the lease length should you decide to sell. The conveyancing solicitors that we work with have a in-depth market knowledge handling many hundreds of lease extensions or freehold purchase transactions.
In the wake of eight months of protracted negotiations with the landlord of her ground floor flat in Mile End, Melissa initiated the lease extension process just as the lease was coming close to the crucial eighty-year deadline. The legal work was concluded in July 2015. The landlord’s costs were negotiated to slightly above 550 GBP.
In 2009 we were called by Dr Y Brooks who, having completed a ground floor apartment in Mile End in November 2010. The dilemma was if we could shed any light on how much (roughly) price could be to prolong the lease by a further 90 years. Identical properties in Mile End with 100 year plus lease were in the region of £265,200. The mid-range amount of ground rent was £65 invoiced quarterly. The lease came to a finish in 2092. Considering the 66 years as a residual term we calculated the compensation to the landlord for the lease extension to be between £15,200 and £17,600 plus fees.
An example of a Freehold Enfranchisement case for a Mile End residence is 26 Rhondda Grove in June 2009. The net price payable by the leaseholders as determined by the Tribunal was £3,015.13. This comprised £11,300 premium for the reversion less £8,284.87 costs as ordered by the County Court.