Stop! Your Lease Extension in Stoke Newington Could Be FREE

Many leaseholders in Stoke Newington are unaware that their original lawyer had a duty to warn them about future mortgageability and saleability issues. Before you pay thousands to your freeholder, let us audit your purchase history. You might have a claim that pays for your lease extension in full

If you are facing a significant premium because your lease in Stoke Newington has dropped toward the 80-year mark, your previous lawyer may be at fault. Our panel of experts specialise in recovering lease extension costs from negligent firms who failed to protect your investment.

Why you should start your Stoke Newington lease extension


Why you should commence your Stoke Newington lease extension today:

Increase your lease and increase your Stoke Newington property value

When it comes to long leasehold premises in Stoke Newington, you effectively rent it for a certain period of time. These days flat leases typically tend to be for 99 years or 125. Even though this may appear like a lengthy period of time, you should think about extending the lease sooner rather than later. The general rule is that the shorter the lease is the cost of extending the lease increases markedly particularly once there are less than eighty years remaining. Residents in Stoke Newington with a lease drawing near to 81 years unexpired should seriously think of extending it as soon as possible. When the lease term has under eighty years left, under the relevant legislation the landlord can calculate and demand a larger amount, based on a technical computation, known as “marriage value” which is payable.

An extended lease is almost the same value as a freehold

Leasehold residencies in Stoke Newington with in excess of 100 years unexpired on the lease are sometimes referred to as ‘virtual freehold’. This is where the lease is worth the same as a freehold interest in your premises. In such situations there is often little to be gained by buying the freehold unless savings on ground rent and maintenance charges warrant it.

Mortgage lenders will not lend with a short lease

The trend since the credit crunch has been for lenders to tighten lending requirements across the board - this has extended to the property over which the home loan is to be charged. This has meant the unexpired lease term required by mortgage companies has increased. Historically lenders would lend on a lease with twenty years plus the term of the loan - typically fifty year leases but those requirements are being increasingly undermined by the requirement for lengthy leases - many now have a minimum term of 75 years as a prerequisite.

Lender Requirement
Accord Mortgages 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage. Please ensure that you explain the implications of a short term lease to the borrower.
Bank of Scotland Minimum 70 years from the date of the mortgage.
Barclays plc Leases with less than 70 years at the commencement of the mortgage are not acceptable.

Leases with fewer than 70 years should only be referred to the issuing office where the following scenario applies, as discretion may be applied subject to bank approval:

• Property is located in any of the following prestigious developments: Cadogan, Crown, Grosvenor, Howard de Walden, Portman or Wellcome Trust Estates in Central London AND
• The value of the property subject to the short remaining term is £500,000 or more AND
• The loan to value does not exceed 90% for purchases, 90% like for like re-mortgages, 80% for re-mortgages with any element of capital raising and 80% for existing Barclays mortgage borrowers applying for additional borrowing;
Skipton Building Society 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage

For Buy to Let cases:
- lettings must not breach any of the lessee’s covenants; and
- consent of the lessor to lettings must be obtained if necessary
Yorkshire Building Society 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage. Please ensure that you explain the implications of a short term lease to the borrower.

Get in touch with one of our Stoke Newington lease extension solicitors or enfranchisement solicitors

Retaining our service gives you enhanced control over the value of your Stoke Newington leasehold, as your property will be more valuable and saleable in respect of lease length should you wish to sell. The lawyers that we work with have a in-depth market knowledge handling many hundreds of lease extensions or freehold purchase transactions.

Stoke Newington Lease Extension Case Summaries:

Alex, Stoke Newington, London,

Alex was the the leasehold proprietor of a studio flat in Stoke Newington on the market with a lease of a few days over sixty years remaining. Alex on an informal basis spoke with his landlord being a well known London-based freehold company for a lease extension. The freeholder indicated a willingness to grant an extension taking the lease to 125 years subject to an increased rent to £125 yearly. No ground rent would be payable on a lease extension were Alex to invoke his statutory right. Alex obtained expert advice and secured an acceptable deal informally and sell the property.

Stoke Newington case:

Last Spring we were contacted by Dr Matthew Laurent , who acquired a one bedroom flat in Stoke Newington in May 2011. We are asked if we could shed any light on how much (roughly) compensation to the landlord could be to prolong the lease by an additional years. Comparative residencies in Stoke Newington with 100 year plus lease were valued around £235,200. The mid-range ground rent payable was £45 collected yearly. The lease expired in 2092. Given that there were 66 years unexpired we calculated the premium to the freeholder to extend the lease to be within £12,400 and £14,200 not including costs.

Decision in Hackney

An example of a Lease Extension decision for a Stoke Newington residence is Lower Flat 16A Beatty Road in September 2012. The premium payable was £13,577. The terms of the lease has been agreed between the Applicants and the First Respondent and the Tribunal did not seek to disturb that agreement. This case was in relation to 1 flat.