Stop! Your Lease Extension in Warfield Could Be FREE

Many leaseholders in Warfield are unaware that their original lawyer had a duty to warn them about future mortgageability and saleability issues. Before you pay thousands to your freeholder, let us audit your purchase history. You might have a claim that pays for your lease extension in full

If you are facing a significant premium because your lease in Warfield has dropped toward the 80-year mark, your previous lawyer may be at fault. Our panel of experts specialise in recovering lease extension costs from negligent firms who failed to protect your investment.

Top reasons for Warfield lease extension


Top reasons for lease extension now:

Increase your lease and increase your Warfield property value

Unfortunately that a Warfield residential lease is a deteriorating asset. The lease value reduces in proportion to its lease length. The extent of this is not fully appreciated in the early years due to the depreciation being disguised by increases in the Warfield property market.Where your lease has approximately 90 years left, you need to start thinking about a lease extension. If lease term drops under 80 years, you will then be required to pay half of the property's 'marriage value' on top of the usual cost of the lease extension to the landlord. The marriage fee is the amount of extra value that a lease extension will add the property Most flat owners in Warfield will be able to extend under the legislation; however a lawyer should be able to confirm whether you qualify for an extension. In some situations you may not be entitled. There are also strict timeframes and procedures to be adhered to once the process has commenced and you will need to be guided by your conveyancing solicitor from beginning to end of the process.

An extended lease is almost the same value as a freehold

Leasehold residencies in Warfield with over 100 years unexpired on the lease are often regarded as a ‘virtual freehold’. This is where the lease is worth the same as a freehold interest in your premises. In such situations there is often little upside in buying the reversionary interest unless savings on ground rent and maintenance charges warrant it.

Mortgage lenders may decide not to finance a property with a short lease

Nearly all mortgage lenders require a lengthy amount of time left on any leasehold property before they will consider it as adequate security. Even if you don't require a mortgage, you should be aware that it is probable that someone intending to buy your property in the future might well do, so in the event that they are not able to secure a mortgage, then the financial worth of your property will likely be adversely impacted. Since 2008 most banks and building societies have increased the required minimum lease length that they are prepared to lend on

Lender Requirement
Accord Mortgages 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage. Please ensure that you explain the implications of a short term lease to the borrower.
Bank of Scotland Minimum 70 years from the date of the mortgage.
Halifax Minimum 70 years from the date of the mortgage.
Leeds Building Society 85 years remaining from the start of the mortgage.
TSB Minimum of 70 years at mortgage commencement, with 30 years remaining at mortgage redemption.

What makes us experts in Warfield lease extensions?

Retaining our service will provide you better control over the value of your Warfield leasehold, as your property will be more valuable and saleable in respect of lease length should you wish to sell. The conveyancers that we work with are well versed in the legislation handling many hundreds of lease extensions or freehold purchase transactions.

Warfield Lease Extension Case Summaries:

Jacob, Warfield, Berkshire,

Jacob was the the leasehold owner of a studio flat in Warfield being sold with a lease of just over fifty eight years left. Jacob informally approached his freeholder being a well known local-based freehold company for a lease extension. The landlord indicated a willingness to extend the lease to 125 years on the basis of an increased rent to £125 yearly. No ground rent would be due on a lease extension were Jacob to invoke his statutory right. Jacob obtained expert advice and secured an acceptable resolution without resorting to tribunal and sell the property.

Warfield case:

Dr Jessica Cook moved into a one bedroom apartment in Warfield in July 1999. We are asked if we could shed any light on how much (approximately) compensation to the landlord would be to extend the lease by an additional years. Similar premises in Warfield with an extended lease were worth £250,000. The mid-range ground rent payable was £50 collected every twelve months. The lease lapsed on 18 October 2095. Having 69 years remaining we estimated the premium to the landlord for the lease extension to be within £9,500 and £11,000 plus fees.

Warfield case:

In 2009 we were called by Dr A Gray who, having acquired a ground floor flat in Warfield in January 2012. The dilemma was if we could shed any light on how much (roughly) premium would likely be to extend the lease by ninety years. Identical properties in Warfield with a long lease were worth £285,000. The average ground rent payable was £55 collected per annum. The lease finished on 15 June 2106. Considering the 80 years unexpired we estimated the premium to the landlord for the lease extension to be between £12,400 and £14,200 exclusive of legals.