Stop! Your Lease Extension in Battle Could Be FREE

Many leaseholders in Battle are unaware that their original lawyer had a duty to warn them about future mortgageability and saleability issues. Before you pay thousands to your freeholder, let us audit your purchase history. You might have a claim that pays for your lease extension in full

If you are facing a significant premium because your lease in Battle has dropped toward the 80-year mark, your previous lawyer may be at fault. Our panel of experts specialise in recovering lease extension costs from negligent firms who failed to protect your investment.

Top reasons for Battle lease extension


Top reasons for lease extension now:

A Battle leasehold property depreciates with the years remaining on the lease.

When it comes to domestic leasehold property in Battle, you effectively rent it for a certain amount of time. These days flat leases are usually granted for 99 years or 125. Even though this may appear like a long period of time, you may think about a lease extension sooner rather than later. The general rule is that the shorter the lease is the cost of extending the lease becomes disproportionately more expensive notably when there are less than 80 years left. Residents in Battle with a lease approaching 81 years unexpired should seriously think of extending it sooner rather than later. When the lease term has fewer than eighty years remaining, under the current statute the freeholder can calculate and demand a larger amount, assessed on a technical computation, strangely termed as “marriage value” which is due.

Battle property with a lease extension is almost the same value as a freehold

Leasehold premises in Battle with in excess of one hundred years remaining on the lease are often regarded as a ‘virtual freehold’. This is where the lease is worth the same as a freehold interest in your premises. In such situations there is often little to be gained by purchasing the reversionary interest unless savings on ground rent and service charges warrant it.

Lending institutions may decide not to issue a mortgage with a short lease

Lenders are tightening their criteria and many now require flats to have a minimum of 60 if not 70 years remaining at the expiry of the mortgage. Considering a number of flats in Battle were built in the fifties, sixties and seventies as a result many now require lease extensions if they if they are to be mortgageable.

Lender Requirement
Barnsley Building Society 60 years from the date of the mortgage application subject to 35 years remaining at the end of the mortgage term.
Godiva Mortgages A minimum of 70 years unexpired lease at completion for all scheme types apart from Lifetime Mortgages (Equity Release), which require a minimum unexpired term of 80 years at completion.
Skipton Building Society 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage

For Buy to Let cases:
- lettings must not breach any of the lessee’s covenants; and
- consent of the lessor to lettings must be obtained if necessary
Royal Bank of Scotland Mortgage term plus 30 years.
Yorkshire Building Society 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage. Please ensure that you explain the implications of a short term lease to the borrower.

What makes us experts in Battle lease extensions?

Retaining our service gives you better control over the value of your Battle leasehold, as your property will be more valuable and marketable in relation to the lease length should you want to sell. The lawyers that we work with have a in-depth market knowledge handling many hundreds of lease extensions or freehold purchase transactions.

Battle Lease Extension Case Summaries:

Owen, Battle, East Sussex

Last Summer Owen, came perilously near to the 80-year mark with the lease on his leasehold apartment in Battle. Having purchased his flat twenty years ago, the unexpired term was of no significance. Thankfully, it dawned on him that he needed to take steps soon on a lease extension. Owen arranged for a lease extension just in the nick of time in June. Owen and the freeholder via the managing agents in the end agreed on an amount of £5,500 . If he failed to meet the deadline, the figure would have gone up by a minimum £1,125.

Battle case:

Last Winter we were e-mailed by Mr and Mrs. M King , who completed a garden apartment in Battle in September 1995. We are asked if we could approximate the compensation to the landlord would likely be to extend the lease by an additional years. Identical homes in Battle with a long lease were worth £267,600. The mid-range amount of ground rent was £65 invoiced quarterly. The lease lapsed in 2093. Taking into account 67 years outstanding we estimated the premium to the landlord to extend the lease to be between £14,300 and £16,400 exclusive of fees.

Battle case:

In 2014 we were e-mailed by Dr Joshua Garcia who, having purchased a ground floor apartment in Battle in August 1997. The dilemma was if we could approximate the compensation to the landlord would likely be to prolong the lease by a further 90 years. Comparable flats in Battle with a long lease were worth £206,200. The mid-range ground rent payable was £55 invoiced quarterly. The lease ran out in 2082. Considering the 56 years unexpired we approximated the premium to the freeholder to extend the lease to be between £31,400 and £36,200 not including fees.