Stop! Your Lease Extension in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge Could Be FREE

Many leaseholders in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge are unaware that their original lawyer had a duty to warn them about future mortgageability and saleability issues. Before you pay thousands to your freeholder, let us audit your purchase history. You might have a claim that pays for your lease extension in full

If you are facing a significant premium because your lease in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge has dropped toward the 80-year mark, your previous lawyer may be at fault. Our panel of experts specialise in recovering lease extension costs from negligent firms who failed to protect your investment.

Top reasons for Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge lease extension


Why you should start your Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge lease extension today:

Increase your lease and increase your Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge property value

Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge leases on residential properties are gradually diminishing in value. The shorter the remaining lease term becomes, the less it is worth – and accordingly any extension of the lease becomes more expensive. Most owners of residential leasehold property in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge enjoy rights under legislation to extend the terms of their leases. If you are a leasehold owner in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge you must check if your lease has between 70 and ninety years remaining. There are compelling reasons why a Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge flat owner with a lease having around 80 years left should take action to ensure that a lease extension is actioned without delay

An extended lease has roughly the same value as a freehold

Leasehold residencies in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge with more than 100 years left on the lease are often regarded as a ‘virtual freehold’. This is where the lease value the same as a freehold interest in your premises. In such situations there is often little upside in buying the reversionary interest unless savings on ground rent and maintenance charges merit it.

Lenders will not lend with a short lease

The propensity since 2008 has been for mortgage companies to tighten lending criteria across the board - this has extended to the property over which the home loan is to be granted. This has meant the unexpired lease term required by banks has increased. Historically banks were content with twenty years plus the term of the loan - routinely fifty year leases but those requirements evolved by the requirement for lengthy leases - many use a minimum term of 75 years as a prerequisite.

Lender Requirement
Barnsley Building Society 60 years from the date of the mortgage application subject to 35 years remaining at the end of the mortgage term.
Halifax Minimum 70 years from the date of the mortgage.
Leeds Building Society 85 years remaining from the start of the mortgage.
Skipton Building Society 85 years from the date of completion of the mortgage

For Buy to Let cases:
- lettings must not breach any of the lessee’s covenants; and
- consent of the lessor to lettings must be obtained if necessary
Royal Bank of Scotland Mortgage term plus 30 years.

Get in touch with one of our Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge lease extension solicitors or enfranchisement solicitors

Retaining our service will provide you increased control over the value of your Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge leasehold, as your property will be more valuable and marketable in respect of lease length should you decide to sell. The conveyancing solicitors that we work with have a in-depth market knowledge handling many hundreds of lease extensions or freehold purchase transactions.

Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge Lease Extension Example Cases:

Zachary, Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge, South Yorkshire,

Zachary was the the leasehold proprietor of a high value apartment in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge being marketed with a lease of fraction over 61 years unexpired. Zachary informally spoke with his landlord a well known Manchester-based freehold company for a lease extension. The landlord indicated a willingness to grant an extension taking the lease to 125 years on the basis of a rise in the rent to £200 per annum. Ordinarily, ground rent would not be payable on a lease extension were Zachary to exercise his statutory right. Zachary obtained expert legal guidance and secured an acceptable resolution without resorting to tribunal and sell the flat.

Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge case:

In 2013 we were contacted by Dr Aarav Martin who, having acquired a newly refurbished flat in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge in September 1997. We are asked if we could estimate the compensation to the landlord would likely be to prolong the lease by a further 90 years. Identical properties in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge with an extended lease were valued about £225,400. The average amount of ground rent was £45 collected per annum. The lease terminated on 2 October 2090. Given that there were 64 years unexpired we calculated the premium to the freeholder to extend the lease to be within £15,200 and £17,600 not including expenses.

Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge case:

Last year we were contacted by Dr T Cook , who owned a studio apartment in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge in March 2011. The question was if we could shed any light on how much (roughly) compensation to the landlord would likely be to extend the lease by an additional years. Similar homes in Fir Vale and Wadsley Bridge with a long lease were worth £270,000. The mid-range amount of ground rent was £55 invoiced monthly. The lease terminated on 15 June 2101. Given that there were 75 years left we calculated the premium to the freeholder for the lease extension to be between £9,500 and £11,000 plus legals.