Stop! Your Lease Extension in Tottenham Could Be FREE

Many leaseholders in Tottenham are unaware that their original lawyer had a duty to warn them about future mortgageability and saleability issues. Before you pay thousands to your freeholder, let us audit your purchase history. You might have a claim that pays for your lease extension in full

If you are facing a significant premium because your lease in Tottenham has dropped toward the 80-year mark, your previous lawyer may be at fault. Our panel of experts specialise in recovering lease extension costs from negligent firms who failed to protect your investment.

Why you should start your Tottenham lease extension


Top reasons for lease extension now:

A Tottenham lease depreciates with the years remaining on the lease.

Tottenham leases on residential properties are gradually decreasing in value. The shorter the remaining lease term becomes, the less it is worth – and accordingly any extension of the lease gets more expensive. The majority of owners of residential leasehold property in Tottenham enjoy rights under legislation to extend the terms of their leases. Where you are a leasehold owner in Tottenham you really ought to see if your lease has between seventy and 90 years left. In particular once the remaining lease term slips under 80 years, the amount payable for any lease extension increases dramatically as part of the premium you pay is what is known as a marriage value

Tottenham property with a lease extension is almost the same value as a freehold

It is generally accepted that a property with more than 100 years remaining is worth roughly the equivalent as a freehold. Where an further 90 years added to any lease with more than 45 years unexpired, the premises will be equivalent in value to a freehold for many years ahead.

Mortgage lenders may decide not to issue a mortgage on a short lease

Banks and building societies are tightening their criteria and many now expect flats to have at least sixty if not seventy years left at the expiry of the mortgage. Considering a number of flats in Tottenham were created in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s as a result many now need to be extended if they if they are to be mortgageable.

Lender Requirement
Accord Mortgages
Barclays plc
National Westminster Bank
TSB
Royal Bank of Scotland

What makes us experts in Tottenham lease extensions?

Regardless of whether you are a tenant or a landlord in Tottenham,the lease extension solicitors that we work with will always be willing to discuss any residential leasehold matters and offer you the benefit of their in-depth market knowledge and the close ties they enjoy with Tottenham valuers.

Tottenham Lease Extension Case Studies:

Chantelle, Tottenham, North London,

After protracted negotiations with the landlord of her leasehold flat in Tottenham, Chantelle started the lease extension process just as her lease was approaching the crucial 80-year deadline. The legal work was concluded in June 2015. The landlord’s charges were restricted to about 500 GBP.

Tottenham case:

In 2014 we were called by Mr and Mrs. U Reed who, having acquired a one bedroom flat in Tottenham in September 1999. The dilemma was if we could estimate the price would be for a ninety year extension to my lease. Comparative residencies in Tottenham with a long lease were valued about £200,800. The average amount of ground rent was £65 collected monthly. The lease finished in 2086. Considering the 60 years as a residual term we estimated the compensation to the landlord to extend the lease to be between £20,900 and £24,200 exclusive of expenses.

Decision in Haringey

An example of a Freehold Enfranchisement case for a Tottenham residence is 30 Strode Road in June 2013. Following a vesting order by Edmonton County Court on 20th February 2013 the Tribunal arrived at a valuation for enfranchisement of £10,256 for the premises (£4,074 for the Ground Floor Flat and £6182 for the First Floor Flat) and £100 for the appurtenant land. This case was in relation to 2 flats. The number of years remaining on the existing lease(s) was 83.33 and 77.3.